I’ve used the Viltrox with both the 50mm 1.8 and the 85mm 1.8 with absolutely stellar results which I can post below if anyone is interested in that. I can honestly say that the trade off between 1.8 and 1.2 isn’t worth it, but I’d be willing to go with the f2 option over the f2.8 in an absolute necessity situation with the Tokina. In a pinch you can get away a few of these lenses at the wide end but it isn’t recommended - by myself at least. Suffice it to say, this isn’t the optimal way to use these lenses or the speedbooster. Suffice it to say I don’t think I need to post how that lens performs without the speedbooster.įor comparisons sake here’s the Canon 50mm 1.8 STM Lens: This is mostly a showcase of the extra light gathered, corner performance, and vignetting caused from using these lenses. These tests are far from scientific and I didn’t use a tripod for any of these shots as I was pressed for time. I have all in-camera corrections turned off and these are all SOOC jpgs. I’ve tested the Tokina 11-16 2.8, Sigma 18-35 1.8, and the Sigma 17-50 2.8 here at max aperture, 1/50 shutter speed, and 800 ISO.
I’ve seen a few people wondering how EF Mount APS-C lenses fare with the speedbooster. I decided to do something a little different as we have a few threads already about the Viltrox EF EOS M2.
0 kommentar(er)
